Contact
Write to Us And We Would Be Happy to Advise You.
Do you have any questions, or would you like to speak directly with a representative?
(function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-NJCSS3WC');
(function(w, d, n, a, j, s) { w[n] = w[n] || function() { return (w[n].a = w[n].a || []).push(arguments); }; j = d.createElement('script'); j.async = true; j.src = 'https://sirius-it-site.lx.netease.com/site-sdk.js'; j.onload = function() { setTimeout(()=> { __siteSDK__.setDefaultConfig({ outerKey: 'key755c0256fd32494cac5e62fa5bf55928', }); __siteSDK__.init(); }, 500); }; s = d.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(j, s); })(window, document, '__siteSDK__');By
In the era of smart devices, industrial automation, and 5G technology, the printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) process is the backbone of every functional electronic product. The choice between Surface Mount Technology (SMT), Through-Hole Technology (THT), or mixed assembly directly impacts a device’s size, reliability, cost, and performance. For example, a smartphone’s compact PCB relies on SMT for miniaturization, while an industrial motor controller uses THT for ruggedness against vibration. Understanding the nuances of each method—their strengths, limitations, and ideal applications—helps manufacturers optimize production, reduce defects, and deliver products that meet modern electronics’ demanding standards. Below, we break down key PCBA processes, compare their workflows, and guide you to select the right method for your project.
The three primary PCBA methods—SMT, THT, and mixed assembly—are designed to address distinct project needs. Their differences in component mounting, automation, and durability make them suited for specific applications.
SMT and THT represent the two most common PCBA approaches, each with unique workflows and use cases. The table below highlights their key distinctions:
Feature | Through-Hole Technology (THT) | Surface Mount Technology (SMT) |
Component Mounting | Leads inserted through drilled PCB holes; soldered on the opposite side. | Components placed directly on PCB surface; soldered via reflow oven. |
Mechanical Strength | Exceptional (10N+ solder joint strength); resists vibration/thermal stress. | Moderate (relies on solder paste adhesion); less durable under extreme stress. |
Automation Level | Low (manual insertion for most components; wave soldering for batch processing). | High (automated pick-and-place machines; 30,000+ components per hour). |
PCB Design Impact | Requires drilled holes; limits component density (single-sided or low-layer boards). | No holes needed; supports double-sided mounting and high-layer HDI PCBs. |
Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit cost (drilling, manual labor); ideal for low-volume/prototypes. | Lower per-unit cost in mass production (automation reduces labor); higher upfront equipment investment. |
Ideal Applications | Industrial controllers, automotive power modules, aerospace electronics. | Smartphones, laptops, IoT sensors, 5G routers. |
Repairability | Easy (components removed/replaced with basic soldering tools). | Difficult (requires specialized rework stations for small SMT parts like 01005 resistors). |
Real-World Examples:
Mixed assembly integrates SMT and THT on a single PCB, leveraging the strengths of each method to solve complex design challenges. For example, a home HVAC controller uses SMT for microchips and LEDs (compact, automated) and THT for power connectors (durable, easy to plug/unplug).
The workflow follows a sequential order to avoid damaging SMT components during THT processing:
Ideal Use Cases: Automotive infotainment systems (SMT for touchscreen controllers, THT for USB ports), industrial power supplies (SMT for voltage regulators, THT for input/output terminals).
Before diving deeper into processes, it’s critical to distinguish between PCB and PCBA—terms often confused but fundamentally different:
Every modern electronic device—from a smartwatch to a factory robot—relies on PCBA to:
Without PCBA, even the most advanced components (e.g., 7nm microchips) would be useless—they need a structured assembly to communicate and operate as a system.
Each PCBA method follows a structured workflow to ensure quality and consistency. Below is a detailed breakdown of SMT, THT, and mixed assembly processes, with insights into automation and quality control.
SMT is the most automated PCBA method, optimized for speed and precision:
THT is more labor-intensive but critical for durability:
As noted earlier, mixed assembly combines SMT and THT steps, with careful temperature control to protect SMT components:
No single method is “best”—each has tradeoffs that must align with project goals.
Pros | Cons |
High component density (saves space) | Difficult rework for small components |
Fast automation (30k+ components/hour) | Susceptible to thermal/vibration stress |
Low per-unit cost in mass production | High upfront equipment investment |
Supports high-frequency designs (low lead inductance) | Requires advanced inspection (AOI/X-ray) |
Pros | Cons |
Strong mechanical bonds (vibration-resistant) | Low component density (larger PCBs) |
Easy repairability (basic tools) | Slow manual insertion (high labor cost) |
Ideal for high-power components | Not suitable for miniaturized devices |
Low upfront cost (no expensive SMT equipment) | Limits PCB layer count (single/double-sided) |
Pros | Cons |
Balances miniaturization and durability | Complex process coordination (SMT → THT) |
Optimizes cost (automation + targeted THT) | Higher inspection requirements (dual methods) |
Supports complex designs (signal + power) | Risk of SMT damage during wave soldering |
Selecting a method depends on three critical factors: product complexity, production volume, and quality requirements.
Modern PCBA faces hurdles like miniaturization and complex designs—here’s how to address them:
A PCB is a bare board with copper traces; a PCBA is a PCB with mounted/soldered components, making it functional.
LTPCBA uses AOI (surface defects), X-ray (hidden joints), and follows ISO 9001/IPC-A-610 standards. Strict process controls (e.g., reflow temperature monitoring) maintain a 99.5% first-pass yield.
THT—its strong solder joints withstand vibration better than SMT. For mixed needs (e.g., sensors + power), LTPCBA’s mixed assembly balances durability and miniaturization.
Yes—LTPCBA offers flexible SMT/THT/mixed assembly, supporting prototypes (5–100 units) and mid-volume production (100–10,000 units) with quick turnaround (5–7 days for prototypes).
Choosing the right PCBA method—SMT, THT, or mixed assembly—depends on your product’s size, environment, and volume. SMT excels at miniaturization and mass production, THT at durability, and mixed assembly at complex, high-demand designs. Partnering with a manufacturer that masters all methods (like LTPCBA) ensures access to DFM guidance, advanced inspection, and flexible production—critical for delivering reliable modern electronics. By aligning process choice with project goals, you optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market.
Do you have any questions, or would you like to speak directly with a representative?